onepage 信頼される安心を、社会へ。

[広告] 楽天市場

ついにonepageのオンライン化が進行中？

https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%98%A5%E7%A7%8B%E6%88%A6%E5%9B%BD%E6%99%82%E4%BB%A3

（さけいればしたいず）　管仲

三十六策、走るをこれ上計とす（南斉書）

（さんじゅうろくさく、にぐるをこれじょうけいとす）壇道済という将軍

赤字はよく使われると思う日本語

このほかにもたくさんあるとおもいますがほんの一例

1〉屈原―憂国詩人単行本 1983/3

onepageの通販ショップをリサーチ！

– 2009 – ‎Philosophy

But more than this, the principle also implies the ineradicable indeterminacyof any conjugate variable, i.e., the impossibility of zero error for that variable since it entails a singularity, namely, division by zero. Apart from the formal-type considerations we have given to quantum uncertainty, various intuitive approaches, not all entirely satisfying, are often invoked to enhance our grasp of this basic quantum feature. On one account, an analogy is drawn between the “matter waves” …

とても興味深く読みました：ハイゼンベルク：不確定性原理

\documentclass[12pt]{article}

\usepackage{latexsym,amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,amstext,amsthm}

\numberwithin{equation}{section}

\begin{document}

\title{\bf  Announcement410 :  What is mathematics? —  beyond logic; for great challengers on the division by zero\\

(2018.１.30.)}

\author{{\it Institute of Reproducing Kernels}\\

Kawauchi-cho, 5-1648-16,\\

Kiryu 376-0041, Japan\\

}

\date{\today}

\maketitle

The Institute of Reproducing Kernels is dealing with the theory of division by zero calculus and declares that the division by zero was discovered as $0/0=1/0=z/0=0$ in a natural sense on 2014.2.2. The result shows a new basic idea on the universe and space since Aristotelēs (BC384 – BC322) and Euclid (BC 3 Century – ), and the division by zero is since Brahmagupta  (598 – 668 ?).

In particular,  Brahmagupta defined as $0/0=0$ in Brāhmasphuṭasiddhānta (628), however, our world history stated that his definition $0/0=0$ is wrong over 1300 years, but, we showed that his definition is suitable.

For the details, see the references and the site: http://okmr.yamatoblog.net/

We wrote a global book manuscript \cite{s18} with 154 pages

and stated that the division by zero is trivial and clear,  and in the last section of the manuscript we stated as follows:

\bigskip

\bigskip

{\bf Conclusion}

\medskip

Apparently, the common sense on the division by zero with a long and mysterious history is wrong and our basic idea on the space around the point at infinity is also wrong since Euclid. On the gradient or on derivatives we have a great missing since $\tan (\pi/2) = 0$. Our mathematics is also wrong in elementary mathematics on the division by zero.

This book is an elementary mathematics  on our division by zero as the first publication of  books for the topics. The contents  have wide connections to various fields beyond mathematics. The author expects the readers write some philosophy, papers and essays on the division by zero from this simple source book.

The division by zero theory may be developed and expanded greatly as in the author’s conjecture whose break theory was recently given surprisingly and deeply by  Professor Qi’an Guan \cite{guan} since 30 years proposed  in \cite{s88} (the original is in \cite {s79}).

We have to arrange globally our modern mathematics with our division by zero  in our undergraduate level.

We have to change our basic ideas for our space and world.

We have to change globally our textbooks and scientific books on the division by zero.

\bigskip

However, we have still curious situations and opinions for us on the division by zero; in particular, the two great challengers Jakub Czajko  and Ilija Barukčić on the division by zero in connection with physics stated that we do not have the definition of the division $0/0$, however $0/0=1$.

They seem to think that a truth is based on physical objects and is not on our mathematics. In such a cases, we will not be able to continue discussions on the division  by zero more, because for mathematicians, they will not be able to follow their logics more. However, then we will ask for the question that what are the values and contributions of your articles and discussions. We will expect some contributions, of course.

This question will reflect to mathematicians contrary. We stated for the estimation of mathematisc in \cite{s97}: Mathematics is the collection of relations and, good results are fundamental,

beautiful, and give

great good impacts to human beings.

With this estimation,  we stated that the Euler formula

$$e^{\pi i} = -1$$

is the best result in mathematics in details in:

\medskip

No.81, May 2012(pdf 432kb)

www.jams.or.jp/kaiho/kaiho-81.pdf

\medskip

In order to show the importance of our division by zero and division by zero calculus we are requested to show their importance.

It seems that the long and mysterious confusions for the division by zero is on the definition. —

Indeed, when we consider the division by zero $a/0$ in the usual sense of the fundamental equation $0 \cdot z= a$, we have immediately the simple contradiction, however, we have such cases may happen, in particular, in mathematical formulas and physical formulas on the universe.

\bibliographystyle{plain}

\begin{thebibliography}{10}

\bibitem{bar}

I. Barukčić,

Dialectical Logic – Negation Of Classical Logic,

http://vixra.org/abs/1801.0256

\bibitem{jake}

J. Czajko, Algebraic division by zero implemented as quasigeometric multiplication by infinity in real and complex multispatial hyperspaces,

Available online at  www.worldscientificnews.com

WSN 92(2) (2018) 171-197

\bibitem{guan}

Q.  Guan,  A proof of Saitoh’s conjecture for conjugate Hardy H2 kernels, arXiv:1712.04207.

\bibitem{kmsy}

M. Kuroda, H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh, and M. Yamane,

New meanings of the division by zero and interpretations on $100/0=0$ and on $0/0=0$,

Int. J. Appl. Math.  {\bf 27} (2014), no 2, pp. 191-198,  DOI: 10.12732/ijam.v27i2.9.

\bibitem{ms16}

T. Matsuura and S. Saitoh,

Matrices and division by zero　z/0=0,

Advances in Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory, {\bf 6}(2016), 51-58

Published Online June 2016 in SciRes.   http://www.scirp.org/journal/alamt

\\ http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/alamt.2016.62007.

\bibitem{ms18}

T. Matsuura and S. Saitoh,

Division by zero calculus and singular integrals. (Submitted for publication)

\bibitem{mms18}

T. Matsuura, H. Michiwaki and S. Saitoh,

$\log 0= \log \infty =0$ and applications. Differential and Difference Equations with Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics \& Statistics.

\bibitem{msy}

H. Michiwaki, S. Saitoh and  M.Yamada,

Reality of the division by zero $z/0=0$.  IJAPM  International J. of Applied Physics and Math. {\bf 6}(2015), 1–8. http://www.ijapm.org/show-63-504-1.html

\bibitem{mos}

H. Michiwaki, H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,

Division by Zero $z/0 = 0$ in Euclidean Spaces,

International Journal of Mathematics and Computation, {\bf 2}8(2017); Issue  1, 2017), 1-16.

\bibitem{osm}

H. Okumura, S. Saitoh and T. Matsuura, Relations of   $0$ and  $\infty$,

Journal of Technology and Social Science (JTSS), {\bf 1}(2017),  70-77.

\bibitem{os}

H. Okumura and S. Saitoh, The Descartes circles theorem and division by zero calculus. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.04961 (2017.11.14).

\bibitem{o}

H. Okumura, Wasan geometry with the division by 0. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.06947 International  Journal of Geometry.

\bibitem{os18}

H. Okumura and S. Saitoh,

Applications of the division by zero calculus to Wasan geometry.

(Submitted for publication).

\bibitem{ps18}

S. Pinelas and S. Saitoh,

Division by zero calculus and differential equations. Differential and Difference Equations with Applications. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics \& Statistics.

\bibitem{romig}

H. G. Romig, Discussions: Early History of Division by Zero,

American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. {\bf 3}1, No. 8. (Oct., 1924), pp. 387-389.

\bibitem{s97}

T. M. Rassias, Editor, Nonlinear Mathematical 　 Analysis and Applications, HadronicPress,Palm Harbor,FL34682-1577,USA:ISBN1-57485-044-X,1998, 　 pp.223–234: Nonlinear transforms and analyticity of functions, Saburou Saitoh.

\bibitem{s79}

S. Saitoh, The Bergman norm and the Szeg$\ddot{o}$ norm, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. {\bf 249} (1979), no. 2, 261–279.

\bibitem{s88}

S. Saitoh, Theory of reproducing kernels and its applications. Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, {\bf 189}. Longman Scientific \& Technical, Harlow; copublished in the United States with John Wiley \& Sons, Inc., New York, 1988. x+157 pp. ISBN: 0-582-03564-3

\bibitem{s14}

S. Saitoh, Generalized inversions of Hadamard and tensor products for matrices,  Advances in Linear Algebra \& Matrix Theory.  {\bf 4}  (2014), no. 2,  87–95. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ALAMT/

\bibitem{s16}

S. Saitoh, A reproducing kernel theory with some general applications,

Qian,T./Rodino,L.(eds.): Mathematical Analysis, Probability and Applications – Plenary Lectures: Isaac 2015, Macau, China, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics,  {\bf 177}(2016),     151-182. (Springer) .

\bibitem{s17}

S. Saitoh, Mysterious Properties of the Point at Infinity、

arXiv:1712.09467 [math.GM](2017.12.17).

\bibitem{s18}

S. Saitoh, Division by zero calculus (154 pages: draft): （http://okmr.yamatoblog.net/）

\bibitem{ttk}

S.-E. Takahasi, M. Tsukada and Y. Kobayashi,  Classification of continuous fractional binary operations on the real and complex fields,  Tokyo Journal of Mathematics,   {\bf 38}(2015), no. 2, 369-380.

\end{thebibliography}

\end{document}

onepage 関連ツイート

RT @JiN_2869: あードキドキする。
onepageの新しいアルバムから1曲視聴出した！

まずは一曲。

RT @JiN_2869: あードキドキする。
onepageの新しいアルバムから1曲視聴出した！

まずは一曲。

@Neko_Inu_ OnePageは本件に関係なく完成させて頂きたい！

フォローする